Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 vs 1650 – Which one is best to choose

If you’re looking for one of the best affordable gaming laptops under $1,000, you’ll most likely have to choose between 2 GPUs: the Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 vs 1650. But how can you know which GPU is best for you? To make things easy for you, the GTX 1660 Ti is much more potent but more costly, and the GTX 1650 is less capable but less expensive.

We utilized two HP Pavilion Gaming 15s with Intel Core i7-9750H processors to evaluate the GPUs, but with a GTX 1660 Ti (6GB VRAM) and another with a GTX 1650 (4GB VRAM) (4GB of VRAM). We put synthetic images benchmarks and gameplay benchmarks to the test. In terms of battery life, both machines managed 5 hours and 26 minutes just on Laptop Mag Full battery, so that’s not an issue.

Comparison between Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and the Geforce GTX 1650

[table id=148 /]

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 – Introduction

The Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti laptop graphics card is predicated on the Turing architecture (TU116 chip). In comparison to faster RTX 2000 GPUs (such as the RTX 2060), the 1660Ti lacks raytracing and Tensor cores. The performance is comparable to the previous GTX 1070 (laptop), but with a lower TGP of 80 Watt (versus 115 Watt). The clock rates are lowered when contrasted to the desktop GTX 1660 Ti (3 percent lower base, 10 percent lower boost). Nvidia upgraded the GTX 1660 Ti with the updated codename N18E-G0-A1 in April 2020, with identical features and pin compatibility to the revised RTX processors (e.g., RTX 2070 Super Mobile).

The Turing generation not just too added raytracing to RTX GPUs, but it also improved the design of the processors and storage. According to Nvidia, CUDA cores now support the execution of floating-point numbers and integers computations for improved performance in compute-intensive tasks seen in modern games. In addition, the caches were modified (new unified memory architecture with twice the cache compared to Pascal). When contrasted to Pascal, this result in up to 50% more commands per clock and 40% higher power efficiency. Nvidia specifies the energy consumed of the 1660Ti for laptops at 80 Watt TGP (Total Graphics Power), which is 20 Watt greater than the effective (but slower) Max-Q model of the 1660 Ti. TSMC manufactures the TU116 chip in 12nm FFN.

Features of Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660:

Wing-blade Fan Design

To minimize drag, our Wing-blade fan style incorporates drooped tips into each fan blade.

Dual Ball Fan Bearings

Each bearing type has its own set of advantages and disadvantages. Ball bearings are more durable than sleeve bearings and can last up to twice as long.

Keep it clean

Dust is a fan’s worst enemy. Cleaning the blades is straightforward, but disassembling the fan to remove dust that has found its way within is a difficult operation. Because the housing is free of harmful particles, you’ll never need to do a thorough cleaning.

Auto−Extreme Technology

Auto-Extreme Technology is a computerized manufacturing technique that raises the technical standards by enabling all welding to be accomplished in a single pass. This decreases heat strain on systems and eliminates the need for harsh cleaning agents, resulting in decreased environmental effects, less manufacturing power usage, and a more dependable product overall.

Compact Design

The Phoenix integrates powerful rendering capability into a small package, maximizing compatibility with the most recent chassis.

GPU Tweak II

The ASUS GPU Tweak II tool elevates graphics card customization to a whole new level. It enables you to fine-tune essential factors such as GPU core clocks, memory frequencies, and voltage parameters, as well as monitor everything within real-time via a configurable on-screen interface. Advanced fan management, as well as a slew of other capabilities, are provided to help you make the most of your graphics card.

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 – Introduction

The Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 laptop video card is predicated on the Turing architecture (TU117 chip). In comparison to faster RTX 2000 GPUs (such as the RTX 2060) is 1650 lacks Raytracing and Tensor cores. The efficiency should be somewhat better than the previous GeForce GTX 1050 Ti. The mobile GTX1650 may employ full 1024 shaders of the TU117 processor, unlike the desktop version, however, there are other variants with 896 shaders.

As of March 2020, the GTX 1650 Mobile will be accessible with quick GDDR6 memory space (N18P-G61, 896 shaders). The Turing generation not just too added raytracing to RTX GPUs, but it also improved the design of the cores and cache. Thus according to Nvidia, CUDA cores natively support the execution of multiple floating-point numbers and integer operations for improved performance in compute-intensive tasks seen in modern games. In addition, the caches were modified (new united memory construction with double the cache associated with Pascal).

When contrasted to Pascal, this result in 50% more commands per clock and 40% higher power efficiency. In comparison to the larger Turing processors, the TU117 lacks the new NVENC encoder in favor of an older one comparable to that seen in Pascal and Volta. Nvidia specifies the energy consumption of 1650 for laptops as 50 Watt TGP, which is 15 Watt greater than the efficient Max-Q model of 1650. TSMC manufactures the TU117 chip in 12nm FFN.

Features of Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650:

Dual fan design

VENTUS is a brand-new twin fan design that openly exposes its industrial forms in neutral hues to compliment any build.

Top-notch cooling performance

MSI Venture graphics cards deliver years of top-notch cooling efficiency thanks to the use of two winners to RX fans 2.0.

Sturdy backplate

A strong backplate strengthens the graphics card while also complementing the design to make it seem even nicer.

Differences between Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and the Nvidia Geforce GTX 1650

1650 Ti vs. 1660: Specs comparison and basic performance lowdown

  • The core clock speed, duration, storage clock speed, memory type (GDDR5), and interface are all identical for the 1650 Ti and 1660. Here are the main distinctions:
  • The GTX 1660 features 1408 CUDA cores as opposed to 1024 in the GTX 1650 Ti.
  • The 1660 is also faster in terms of boosting clock speed (1785 MHz vs. 1725 MHz).
  • In addition, the 1660 features 1,900 million more transistors.
  • The TDP of the 1650 Ti is 75 watts, compared to the TDP of the 1660, which is 120 watts.
  • The 1660 features a 192-bit memory bus width as opposed to the 1650 Ti’s 128-bit.
  • In terms of performance and common benchmarks, the GTX 1660 outperforms the 1650 Ti by 20-40 percent. Similarly, there are scores for popular game FPS discrepancies.

Comparison with other GPUs

The GTX 1660 Super is a minor update: It has 1,408 CUDA cores, like the GTX 1660 it succeeds, with a base frequency of 1,530MHz and an enhanced clock of 1,785MHz. Unless you get to the RAM, every spec NVIDIA published is similar. The GTX 1660 Super does have 6GB of video memory – more than plenty for a card in its class – but it’s GDDR6, not GDDR5, and also the transfer rate is 14Gbps, not 8Gbps. Memory bandwidth is increased from 192 GB/sec to 336 GB/sec, which would be greater than the GTX 1660 Ti and on pace with the original RTX 2060.

This boost in bandwidth is considerable, but it’s impossible to predict how this will affect gaming and professional tasks. Whereas the RTX Supers had significant variances such as higher core counts and clock rates, NVIDIA claims that the RAM upgrades alone will deliver a comparable boost here. According to one chart, a 10-20% improvement over the GTX 1660 may be possible. We expect to be able to independently validate such performance claims soon. While the GTX 1660 Superior is best regarded as a straightforward upgrade, the GTX 1650 Super is not. It appears that card will provide the largest Super increase yet.

In every manner, the GTX 1650 Super outperforms its predecessor. It has 43% more CUDA cores (1280), a base frequency of 1,530MHz, and a maximum clock of 1,725MHz, compared to the original’s 1,485MHz base and 1,665MHz increase. The card’s 4GB of RAM has been updated to GDDR6 at 12 Gbps, increasing overall memory capacity to 192 GB/s, a 50% improvement over the original. These enhancements are accompanied by an increase in power consumption: The new card has a TGP (“total graphics power”) of 100W, up over 75W, and NVIDIA recommends pairing the GTX 1650 Super with a 350W power source, rather than the previous 300W suggestion.

The modifications are startlingly large: the GTX 1650, a GPU competent of 3 TFLOPs, gets “Super” by a 4.4-TFLOP card. That’s a bigger gap than there is between the GTX 1660 and GTX 1660 Ti, much less any other of the Supermodels. According to NVIDIA’s press announcement, “the duo provides up to 2X the capability of the previous generation GTX 10-series GPUs and up to 50% higher performance than the original GTX 16-series.” Some of these comparisons are most likely to the GTX 1650 Super, which has nearly twice the power of the previous-generation GTX 1050 and nearly 50% more performance than the GTX 1650.

On the surface, the GTX 1650 Super appears to be an intriguing update. It’s a low-cost “1080p card” that would likely outperform the GTX 1060 in many games, a comparison which will only increase as games become more tuned for the 16 series’ extra “Turing” architecture, which it combines with more expensive RTX GPUs. However, it’s perplexing that NVIDIA has grouped it alongside the GTX 1660 Super, which now has simply received a memory bump over the GTX 1660. You might argue that the company’s marketing choice was motivated by a need for uniformity, but if there’s ever a GPU that merited the “Ti” moniker, it’s the GTX 1650 Super.

It’s simply perplexing to market these two completely distinct Super cards in the very same way. The GTX 1660 Super is now available for $229, a $10 increase in prices over the original. The GTX 1650 Super will be available for purchase on November 22nd, with prices to be determined before launch. In a scenario in which an AMD RX 580 can be found for $180, NVIDIA must be price aggressive if it is to truly put the strain on its opponent.

So, which one is better?

GTX 1660 is better.

All images and gaming performance analysis show that the 1660 performs admirably. In terms of revenue, it is unquestionably worthwhile to purchase. The GTX 1650 Ti, but on the other side, isn’t awful. And you’re on a tight budget; the efficiency you get still seems to be worth the price.

Synthetic performance of the Nvidia 1660 Ti and the Nvidia 1650

The GTX 1660 Ti achieved 170,781 in the 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited benchmark, just above the GTX 1650, which achieved 167,059 (2.2 percent increase in performance). The GTX 1660 Ti outperformed the GTX 1650 in the 3DMark Fire Strike test, scoring 11,584 to the GTX 1650’s 8,397. (38 percent increase in performance). Finally, the GTX 1650 scored 2,828, surpassing the GTX 1650’s 1,935 in the 3DMark Fire Strike Ultra test (46.2 percent increase in performance).

Gaming performance of the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and Geforce GTX 1650

The GTX 1660 Ti got 46 frames per second on the Shadows of the Tomb Raider benchmark (Largest, 1080p), whereas the GTX 1650 was barely workable at 31 fps (48.4 percent increase in performance). Just on Rising of the Tomb Raider examination (Very Highest, 1080p), the GTX 1660 Ti scored 43 fps, while the GTX 1650 fell short of our 30 fps usability criteria at 29 fps (48.3 percent increase in performance). However, in the Hitman test (Ultra, 1080p), the GTX 1660 Ti outperformed the GTX 1650 with 73 fps to the GTX 1650’s 57 fps (28.1 percent increase in performance).

Here on Grand Theft Auto V test (Very Highest, 1080p), the GTX 1660 Ti and GTX 1650 were always a long way behind, achieving 56 fps and 39 fps, correspondingly (43.59 percent increase in performance). The GTX 1660 Ti achieved 52 fps upon that Metro: Final Light test (Ultra, 1080p), edging out the GTX 1650, which achieved 37 fps (40.5 percent increase in performance). The GTX 1660 Ti achieved 36 fps mostly on Metro: Exodus assessment (Ultra, 1080p) in the sequel, whilst the GTX 1650 was unusable at 25 fps (44 percent increase in performance).

The GTX 1660 Ti and GTX 1650 had a close battle on the Far Cry New World benchmark (Ultra, 1080p), with 62 fps and 54 fps, accordingly (14.8 percent increase in performance). In terms of VR productivity, the GTX 1660 Ti received 9.2 out of 11 in the SteamVR Test Performed, whereas the GTX 1650 received 5.9 out of 11. (55.9 percent increase in performance).

Value of GTX 1660 Ti and the GTX 1650

It costs an additional $270 to go beyond a GTX 1650 to a GTX 1660 Ti when customizing the Pavilion 15. The Pavilion’s original base price is $749; therefore the cost would rise to $1,019, a 36.1 percent increase. By equating the performance gains of our benchmarks, you’d get a 37.3 percent boost in performance for a 36.1 percent rise in price, making the change worthwhile. If you choose the GTX 1660 Ti above the GTX 1650, you’ll get precisely what you pay for in terms of price and performance.

[table id=150 /]

Compare pros and cons of the Nvidia 1660 Ti and the Nvidia 1650

[i2pc show_title=”false” title=”Pros & Cons” show_button=”false” pros_title=”1650″ cons_title=”1660″ ][i2pros]Pros:
• 55% better game performance; • PhysX support
• G-Sync compatibility
• ShadowPlay support (allows game streaming/recording with a minimal performance penalty)
• Direct3D 12 Async Computer Support
• DirectX Raytracing support (DXR)
• Allows for Deep Learning Super-Sampling (DLSS)
• The RAM procedure is poor.
• Compatibility with PhysX
• G-Sync compatibility
• ShadowPlay support (allows game streaming/recording with a minimal performance penalty)
• Direct3D 12 Async Computer Support
• DirectX Raytracing support (DXR)
• Allows for Deep Learning Super-Sampling (DLSS)
• A hardware problem


How to choose a Laptop – A buying guide?

In the last few years, it appears that the overall number of laptops has increased tremendously. And, based on the current yield for this year, the method tends to be continuing. They come in a choice of sizes, forms, and general packages, and even some of the tiniest, biggest, and thinnest types. The variety of designs serves a function. Some have shrunk to save money or increase mobility. Some of the lightest will be less than an inch thick and weigh just 3 to 5 pounds. You may have noticed commercials for “netbooks” recently. It is a new type of laptop with small (7 to 9 inch) displays that weigh about 2 to 3 pounds. The appeal is that they are only approximately $300.

As laptop prices fall, they will be the best alternative to desktop PCs. What you may lose in terms of upgradeability and adaptability, you gain in terms of adaptability and mobility. With the correct laptop home decor, you can eliminate the normal ergonomic concerns associated with solely using a laptop. Also with a proliferation of public wifi connectivity, a laptop computer is becoming more and more useful than a desktop computer.

The Basic Choices (Characterized by screen size):

15.4 inch Models:

This is the path to choose if you value mobility, cheap cost, and high performance as major laptop characteristics. Because efficiency and cost are still so heavily linked, just keep in mind that the cheaper the cost, the slower the CPU. It is not a concern for the vast majority of applications. However, if the budget exceeds the performance, this is an excellent option.

17 inch Models:

If you’re searching for power and efficiency, these bigger laptops are the way to go. There are also some things you must give up. For example, mobility is significantly hampered because certain versions may not usually suit smaller sized laptop bags. They could also weigh up to 6 pounds, so if you frequently walk long distances in airports, this may be an issue.

However, you receive faster performance, a greater screen, and, throughout most cases, superior visual capacity.

14.1 inch Models:

These guys fall exactly in the middle and weigh is about 5 to 6 pounds and cost somewhat less than the larger 17-inch ones.

13.3 inch Models:

These are your best choice for portability and minimal weight. These variants are more expensive due to their smaller footprint. They are only 3 to 5 pounds in weight. A note of warning on these smaller size designs: double-check what is contained inside the laptop’s chassis. Even though these devices appear to be more compact, many of them demand any additional memory or external DVD players.


These were previously known as “sub-notebooks,” and now are often known as netbooks. These are quite tiny, with displays ranging from 7 to 10 inches, and are aimed at consumers who primarily utilize email and Web browsing.

Key features to compare Laptop:


This may appear to be perplexing. To summarize, most people for home and school should opt for a laptop with a “Pentium” Dual Core or AMD Turion X2. If you’re searching for additional performance then go with the Core 2 Duo. For laptops, there is a new version named Centrino 2. For the “power” user, this is a solid option.

Hard Drive and Memory (RAM) Capacity:

The storage range of hard disc drives continues to expand substantially. Laptops often come with hard discs ranging from 120 to 500 GB and RAM ranging from 1GB to 2GB. Although if you already have to shell out money, you should get 2GB of RAM because the latest operating systems (Vista) demand more capacity and this can significantly improve laptop performance.

Operating Systems – Windows vs. Mac:

Windows has remained the most popular laptop operating system. Therefore, if you chat with a Mac user, you will find that they are typically die-hard fans. Both are wonderful and have advantages and disadvantages. Although Windows now offers a much larger selection of apps, Macintosh users may still argue because they’re less vulnerable to viruses and malware. So, go over this checklist and mark whatever features are most essential to you, and you’ll be more than prepared to complete your laptop buy. Accessories, like other electronic equipment, may significantly increase the efficiency and general pleasure of your laptop. Make a note of the appropriate accessories and include them in your shopping list.


Winner product

In terms of value, the Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti graphics card outperforms all competitors in all graphical performance tests. But, the GTX 1650 now has a place since the performance it provides is still worth the expense if you’re seeking to spend less than $1,000. However, if you’re asking which GPU is superior, the GTX 1660 Ti comes out on top in almost every category. It’s well worth the increase in performance.

Frequently asked questions

Which are better GTX 1650 vs 1650 Ti?

Surprisingly, the Ti variant has the lower base and maximum speeds at 1350-1485 MHz, compared to the standard GTX 1650’s 1395-1560 MHz. The GTX 1650 Ti, on the other hand, has a TGP of 55W (a 5W increase), thus it should have slightly more energy headroom. In terms of memory, each of them has 4GB of GDDR6 memory.

Is the GTX 1660 Ti better than the GTX 1660 Super?

However, the GTX 1660 Ti is considerably more suited to coping with those superior quality settings. The GTX 1660 Ti has always been the faster card generally when compared to the GTX 1660 Super, although as you’ve seen below, the 1660 Super comes shockingly close to reaching 60fps on Ultra presets in a surprising number of scenarios.

What is the 1660 TI comparable to?

Throughout all tests, the RTX 2060 outperforms its GTX Turing rivals, providing performance close to, if not occasionally exceeding, that of a GTX 1070 Ti. The 1660 Ti comes with frame rates that are 15 to 25% lower, while it does outperform significant AMD competitors like the RX 590.

Is the 1660 TI good for gaming?

The 1660 Ti offers a fantastic price-quality ratio and is capable of Full HD gaming at extreme settings. However, if you invest an extra 100 to 150 euros on the RTX 2060, you will receive far greater graphics capability in exchange. You can enjoy almost every game in Full HD at high settings, while others in Quad HD, using this video card.

What is the difference between GTX 1660 and GTX 1660 Ti?

The key changes are the amount of CUDA cores: the 1660 has 1408 while the 1660 Ti has 1536, and storage capacity: the 1660 can offer 8 Gpbs using widespread GDDR5 (as found in the GTX 1060 3GB and 6GB) while the 1660 Ti can deliver 12 Gpbs utilizing newer, faster, and more expensive GDDR6.

Is the GTX 1660 Ti worth it?

A contemporary midrange card is the 1660 Ti. This essentially means that it will be OK for console games for a couple of extra years. There is no hard rule, but operating anything of excellent quality for 2–3 years should never be a problem. Further than that, you’ll have to dial down certain settings.

Is the 1650 TI good for gaming?

The biggest draw is the Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Ti graphics card, which would be ideal for low-end 1080p gaming. As soon as you tone down the graphical choices, you should be capable of playing almost any contemporary PC game.

How long will the GTX 1650 Ti last?

With 4GB of GDDR6, you’ll be capable of playing almost any game at low or medium levels for another 7–10 years. Do not purchase the GDDR5 version. The efficiency of the 1650 is comparable to that of the 1050ti. They both have a lifespan of 3–4 years.

Is 8GB RAM enough for gaming?

8GB of RAM is the bare minimum for any gaming PC. Using 8GB of RAM, you should be prepared to play most published games without issue; however, certain games may not play at the superior products, and you may need to close other apps.

Can a 1650 TI run Cyberpunk 2077?

A contemporary mid-range GPU is required to run Cyberpunk 2077 at 1080p. The GeForce GTX 1650 (Ti) and Radeon RX 5500M can produce passable frame rates on low, the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti can play the game nicely on medium, and the GeForce RTX 2060 can manage Cyberpunk on high settings.

What happens if I play a game without enough RAM?

It won’t be a bottleneck because 8GB seems to be plenty of RAM. If you reach out of memory, the operating system will begin destroying the virtual memory, and the PC will be remarkably sluggish as most of the overflow now reaches the hard drive. First and foremost, 8 GB of RAM is plenty for any task.