Wireless mouse are useful since they don’t clog up your desk with cords and can make navigating faster and more efficient than a trackpad. For the most part, they’re also less costly and more dependable than an inexpensive wired mouse. We’ve spent years researching and testing mice with some testers, but we’ve discovered that the Logitech G305 versus Logitech M705 is more pleasant for a wide range of hand sizes and grip types than virtually all another wireless mouse.
Comparison of Logitech G305 vs Logitech M705
Differences between the Logitech G305 and the Logitech M705
We couldn’t uncover enough information about either product to draw any solid judgments. Instead, we strongly advise you to check at some other possibilities in the $40 and $20 price ranges.
The Logitech G305 Light Speed Wireless Mouse (2018) was praised by reviewers at Ratings, a reputable organization that does thorough testing. It performed admirably in its “The Best Wireless Games Mouse – Fall 2021″ review, where it has been rated the “Best Budget Wireless Gaming Mouse,” which offers it a device worth consideration in and of itself.
In terms of our review of the Logitech Marathon Mouse M705 (2009), it has achieved the “Best Battery Life” honor from Windows Central as well as the “Ranked 3 out of 6” award from MakeUseOf, which would be no minor achievement.
We couldn’t discover any sources that evaluated some of these Gaming Mice, so we had to rely on reviews from other websites. We looked at which sites gave each of them the highest ratings, and discovered that the Logitech G305 Light Speed Wireless Mouse (2018) had the highest, 9, rating from slashgear.com, whereas the Logitech Marathon Mouse M705 (2009) received the highest, 9, from Lifewire.
Finally, we took the aggregate of all the user ratings we could locate for these two items and compared them to other Gaming Mice available on the market. We discovered that both of them outperformed most of their competition, with Gaming Mice receiving a responsibility to review an average of 7.5 out of 10, while the Logitech G305 Light Speed Wireless Mouse (2018) and Logitech Marathon Mouse M705 (2009) received 8.0 and 8.7 points, respectively.
However, because of the price difference, it’s crucial to remember that a straight comparison of the Logitech G305 Light Speed Wireless Mouse (2018) vs. The Logitech Marathon Mouse M705 (2009) comparison may not be fair because some sources do not consider value for money when awarding their rankings and hence prefer to evaluate more expensive goods higher.
Logitech G305 review
The Hardware & Software
The G305 is an inconspicuous mouse, extremely plain and straightforward. It features six buttons and asymmetrical form; however, the button arrangement is designed for right-handed users only. There is no recharging port, and the battery is housed in a compartment beneath the palm rest that also houses the nano receiver. That’s all. This is a straightforward design.
It appears easy, yet it is quite exact. There is no slop or giving, the plastics are sturdy, and everything goes together properly. The buttons are accurate, tactile, and crisp. The battery may also be accessed and replaced with one hand. The scroll wheel, like the buttons, is razor-sharp. What more can you ask for than something solid, crisp, and precise?
All of Logitech’s G-series mice employ the HERO sensor, which is widely considered as one of the finest in the market. It’s extremely precise, there’s no smoothing or filtration, it’s quick and efficient, and it consumes very little power. If Logitech develops a superior method for motion sensors, including such working with other surface materials, the sensor may even be loaded with fresh firmware separately from the microcontroller. Since the mouse runs on AA batteries, it is somewhat heavier than if it ran on rechargeable lithium cells. Furthermore, Logitech recommends that customers use the available AA Lithium batteries, which will not only increase the mouse’s already lengthy battery life, and will also lower the weight of an already light mouse.
Logitech G306 LIGHTSPEED Wireless Mouse Battery Compartment & Nano Receiver
Reducing the mouse’s poll frequency from 1000 Hz to 500 Hz will further increase battery life with little to no loss of performance. Even after a long period of inactivity, the mouse wakes up remarkably rapidly. After just a month of using the G305, I’d almost forgotten it was a wireless mouse.
While going through a lot of the mouse’s specifications and technology, I had a few queries that I emailed Logitech about, namely a little graphic about maintaining the receiver 20cm away from the mouse. My first reaction was that this was some sort of power-saving function. When Bluetooth devices are near together, for example, they might enter a low power mode to extend battery life.
Logitech, it seems out, does not do this. However, the sensor’s closeness is mainly for interference prevention, as it operates in the extremely busy 2.4GHz frequency. However, this does not imply that the sensor must be 20cm away; if you intend to be using the big-screen TV for gaming, it works beautifully across many meters.
The same power management technique is used by Logitech’s entire wireless mouse. The poll rate of the USB bus is directly related to the low and high power modes. In power-saving mode, the poll rate is fixed at 125Hz, whereas in high power mode, you may change it to 250, 500, or 1000Hz, with each increment making the mouse somewhat more sensitive but consuming more power. The program can manage all of this.
Most people can notice the difference between 1000 and 125 Hz if they search hard enough, but moving from 1000 to 250 or 500 takes extremely specialized testing and a strong eye. One of the key reasons for all of this is there are many additional aspects involved in the reaction time of a user intervention that goes far beyond the USB bus’s poll rate. When a touch in a game can require 5-10ms, as well as a frame first from GPU, may require 8-30ms, 1-4ms from either the poll rate is almost nothing.
Logitech G306 LIGHTSPEED Wireless Gaming Software DPI
Logitech’s software is also very easy to use, and this has long been the standard method for peripherals. Things remain simple and easy to understand, with less emphasis on gimmicks but more on utility. You may use a single image saved on the mouse, or you could just utilize software mode and have the mouse alter depending on whatever game or program is run.
Unfortunately, with only 6 buttons to choose from on the G305 and no RGB choices, there isn’t much of a need for that kind of diversified software apart from the setup process, in particular for this G305.
The most significant aspects, such as DPI selection, polling, and power rate, may all give from a single menu. The top button’s default behavior is to cycle among DPI modes, but that doesn’t take very long to configure it to switch through only two DPI modes as a sniping button or with basic high, medium, and low DPI settings to flick between. The only thing you can’t do is establish separate X and Y-axis DPI values.
How do you find the best mouse?
In general order of priority, below are the things you should look for in a wireless mouse:
Comfort while using the mouse:
To assess comfort, we tried mice on panels of left- and right-handed persons with a variety of grip patterns and hand sizes. Because hand size affects comfort, we looked for average hand dimensions for adults. (We realize that an average-sized mouse won’t work for everyone, but we utilized this data to ensure that our panel included a broad range of hand sizes.) The Georgia Tech Research Institute’s hand anthropometric data was used (taken from studies conducted in 2002 and 2008).
We calculated that the mean palm size is 4 inches, as well as the average middle finger length, is 2.95 inches by combining the mentioned hand measures. We also dissected a 1981 research of hand anthropometry conducted by the US Army and discovered comparable findings: a 4-inch average from of the base of something like the palm to a base of the middle finger and a 3.23-inch mean from of the base of the middle finger towards the tip. These measures are use to determine if hands are smaller or bigger than usual.
Buttons of the mouse:
Each wireless mouse should feature the typical left-click and correct buttons, as well as the backward and forward buttons; therefore we sought mice with at least 2 side buttons. We also took note of button location and if the buttons were difficult to use.
Bluetooth is required because many laptops currently only have USB-C connections, however, a 2.4 GHz USB wireless receiver (sometimes known as a dongle) is also useful because it is quicker to set up and provides a more reliable connection in some circumstances. The connection should not drop over small distances. If your mouse does have a dongle, this should be inconspicuous, and it should be stored in a hollow.
An excellent wireless mouse will last at least a good few years on replacement batteries or a couple of months on such a charge. The battery life of a mouse declines with time, and then the more it begins with, the better.
Wireless mouse frequently comes with integrated software that allows you to track battery life and configure buttons, sensitivity, velocity, scroll speed, and other settings. Many people do not utilize the software that includes their wireless mouse, but it is a wonderful addition.
The sensor of the mouse:
The sensor on a mouse should be able to record motion accurately and precisely; the cursor should not stop or hop about the screen. The sensor should also be able to function on a range of surfaces, notably desktops, hard and soft mousepads, wood, and cloth.
How do we test the best mouse?
Every mouse is test for roughly a day’s worth of operation on a Windows laptop and a Mac laptop to assess its usability, button location, and software. We also used them against a desk, a firm mouse pad, a soft mouse pad, a wood floor, a huge piece of cloth, glasses, and mirrors, among other popular mousing surfaces. To measure comfort, we tried all three grips—palm, fingertip, and claw with each mouse we evaluated.
We invited left- and right-handed panel testers with varied favored grips to be using our wireless mouse candidates and indicate which ones they liked or disliked after spending several hours with every mouse in 2015, 2017, and 2019. Even though our panelists had a broad variety of hand sizes, their average measures corresponded to the typical hand dimensions we discovered in multiple studies: 4 inches (palm), 3.3 inches (finger), and 7.7 inches (spread). Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, we were unable to panel-test again in 2020, but we started applying our comfortable results from past years’ test panels to our most recent round of testing.
Compare Pros And Cons
The Logitech G305 and the Logitech Marathon Mouse M705 are office mice with similar looks. The Marathon is the winner and suitable for all hand sizes, depending on grip type. It also has slightly lower click latency but doesn’t support Bluetooth, so it only connects wirelessly with its USB receiver. The G305 is a wireless mouse with all the precision of a gaming mouse, and battery life that won’t leave you anxious. The only bit of bling about this mouse is a single blue LED that lights up when it wakes from sleep mode and turns itself off after a couple of seconds. When the battery gets low, it’ll blink red to let you know.